Apple expands legal dispute with Corellium, an iOS virtualization tool provider

Apple expands legal dispute with Corellium, an iOS virtualization tool provider Corellium researchers are under legal attack by Apple, and security companies have responded to efforts to block #iOS virtualization tools with # Apple’s latest law volley and DMCA. Apple filed a lawsuit against Corellium on December 27 that provides a framework for the iOS simulator used by security researchers. Apple stopped calling jailbreak illegal, but recognizes that developing an emulator or similar iOS emulation to make jailbreak tools easier is infringing. In this application, Apple is clear about the approach it will take at trial. This is a direct example of infringing valuable copyrighted works, along with the trafficking and benefit of infringing technologies.Corellium’s business is based entirely on commercializing piracy of copyrighted operating systems and applications running on Apple’s iPhone, iPad and other Apple devices.

Corellium offers a “virtual” version of Apple mobile hardware products that anyone with a web browser can access. In particular, Corellium offers touted as a complete digital facsimile of a wide range of Apple market-leading devices, quickly reproducing attention to detail not only for how the operating system and applications appear to buyers, but also for native buyers. Computer code. Corellium does so without Apple’s license or permission.

Apple also says that legitimate security researchers who use the virtual iOS environment to test exploits have nothing to do with this case.

“Corellium’s conduct clearly violates Apple’s copyrights. It is doubtful or unclear whether the defendant reproduced the copyright holder’s work or, more subtly, whether a particular part of the defendant’s work is ultimately protected by federal copyright. No, Apple says, “Instead, Corellium copies everything exactly, including code, graphical user interfaces, and icons.”

In response to the submission, Corellium has issued a statement. It violates the Digital Millenium Copyright Act and argues that it is using this lawsuit as a test case to further intensify those who break out and make tools.

We are deeply disappointed by the constant demonization of Apple’s jailbreak. In many industries, developers and researchers rely on jailbreak to test the security of their own apps and third-party apps, which can’t be done without jailbreak devices. For example, a recent analysis of the ToTok app showed that the UAE government is using Apple-approved chat apps as surveillance tools, and according to researchers in this analysis this would not have been possible without jailbreak.

Researchers and developers not only rely on jailbreak to protect end users, but Apple itself has also gained the direct benefits of the jailbreak community in many ways. Many features of iOS originally appeared as jailbreak adjustments and were copied by Apple, including dark mode, Control Center, and context menus. In addition, jailbreak creators regularly contribute to iOS security. The developers behind unc0ver jailbreak have been recognized and acknowledged by Apple as supporting the iOS kernel’s security vulnerabilities (a vulnerability discovered while using Corellium).

In August, Apple sued a number of allegedly infringing iPhone manufacturer software copyright to the US District Court for the southern Florida area through Corellium’s mobile device virtualization solution. Apple alleged that Corelium did not license iOS, iTunes, or other user interface technologies for use in its tools, which security companies use to detect iOS issues.

In October, Corellium responded to the lawsuit with several defenses and counterclaims.

Corelium’s “relevant background” begins by insisting that Apple “encourages continued technology development” before making a claim of copyright infringement. During this period, Corellium was approved to participate in the extra-large security bounty program, which was later released to the extra-large researchers.
“Apple was willing to accept and exploit the bug submitted by Corelium as part of the program, but it broke its promise to pay for it,” the company claimed. Later, “Apple announced its own rival and soon after the company sued Coreium, the virtualization company didn’t think Apple thought Corelium was infringing.”

Corelium suggests that Apple’s behavior in relation to security research is generally considered “harmful,” and Apple’s complaint was used as an example of “the desire to exclusively control how security researchers identify vulnerabilities” in the operating system. . . Google Project Zero

Shortly after Apple filed a lawsuit, Corelium’s technology was used as an example of how to “improve the security research and development community”.

Apple claims federal direct infringement allegations against computer software and graphical user interface elements, as well as allegations of federal infringement actions against Corellium product users. The company is seeking orders to prohibit the sale and access to Corellium products, the return of proprietary intellectual property, the destruction or destruction of infringing material, damages and court costs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

%d bloggers like this: